WK 8: Social Media & Journalism
![]() |
| Social media has brought and everlasting change to journalism. Image |
One of
the pitfalls of journalists ‘live-tweeting’ their stories is the fact it’s
stopping people clicking on their websites or buying their publications.
Twitter, essentially becomes users' portal for news. No longer are people
required to go out and buy a publication or even visit a website.
How this
is managed into the future will be an ongoing concern for media organisations.
For example, if I photograph a section of a newspaper and tweet the image –
thereby allowing all my followers and others to read it without purchasing the
publication – am I breaching copyright laws?
How does
the media organisation stay on top of this? They don’t. It’s like photocopying
the newspaper and handing it out to 100 people for free. Isn't this exactly the
same as movie piracy which is so frond upon and highly illegal.
It appears as those publications use their organisational social media
as a means to drive traffic to their website, while their journalists actually
engage and interact with the audience, thereby increasing their own personal
brand and identity.
This process is shared by Posetti’s (2013) assessment of the effects of
twitter on journalism as she proposes the ‘effects have re-cast journalists as individual
reporter brands with a focus on follower engagement, collaborative investigation and the ‘crowdsourcing’ of research (Posetti,
2013, p. 89).
This system can be viewed as a way which will hopefully spur the
audience on to want to read the individual journalists’ articles on the
organisation’s website or in the print publication they actually have to pay
for.
One new
practice to emerge in the television news media is the publication of
individual stories as watchable videos directly in one’s twitter feed. These
videos are ad-free and can be viewed completely free.
Which
begs the question, how are the media companies making any money off these
videos? No ads and they effectively drive traffic away from their actual
website. An example can be seen below.
A man has been arrested in S.A. after allegedly biting off another man's ears after being caught doing burnouts near Adelaide. #7News pic.twitter.com/brP6kUWOsz— 7 News Sydney (@7NewsSydney) September 15, 2017
Around
50% of journalists are now using social media as their main source of
information (ING, 2014).
The infiltration of social media into methods of
collecting and disseminating news was no more on show than this week when
professional rugby union player Israel Folau tweeted he wouldn’t be supporting
same sex marriage.
I love and respect all people for who they are and their opinions. but personally, I will not support gay marriage.✌❤🙏— Israel Folau (@IzzyFolau) September 13, 2017
The tweet sparked an online debate amongst users and
was the source of further discussion and social media reactions from the
general public.
Given Falou’s high-profile identity and his public
stance on the current news item, the BBC ran an online story about the
situation using people’s tweets as their source of information.
The article provides a clear indication of how the platform
and practice of social media is now often becoming the story itself.
Possetti (2013) concludes her chapter on the effects
of social media on journalism with the suggestion that while ‘open
verification’ is going to increase, applying careful research and investigation
methods to social journalism is more
important than ever, highlighting the importance of retaining traditional
journalistic investigation principles when working with the tool of social
media.
References:
ING. (2014). Study impact of
social media on news: More crowd-checking, less fact-checking. Retrieved
from
Possetti,
J. (2013). The
Twitterisation of Investigative Journalism. In S. Tanner & N.
Richardson (Eds.), Journalism research and investigation in a digital
world. (pp.
88-100). South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

Comments
Post a Comment