WK 5: Public Interest Journalism
![]() |
| Could the death of the newspaper industry spell the end of healthy democracies? Image |
The public interest has been described as: ‘in
having a safe, healthy and fully-functioning society’ (Ethical Journalism
Network, n.d.), in which the interests of public services and their provision
to the public are of importance (Ethical Journalism Network, n.d.). It is
providing the information in order for members of society to take part in the
democratic process (Ethical Journalism Network, n.d.). A privacy test can aid the justification for seeking information into
someone’s private affairs. Journalists must consider whether it is in the ‘public
interest’ for potential information to be attained and later publicised. An impact test weighs this consideration
against the potential benefits to wider society if it is publicised (Ethical Journalism
Netowork, n.d.).
The Ethical Journalism Network (n.d.) casts the
suggestion that:
‘publications should
seek to correct significant wrongs, should promote the well-being, welfare and
safety of the public, should raise public awareness of important issues and
should make a contribution towards promoting good conduct in public life’.
Given
only state-funded media organisations are obligated to adhere to a specific
charter, this statement invokes thoughts about commercial media organisations
and their ethical stance in today’s age. They may do many things which promote
good conduct in public life, but they also do things which many would consider
unethical or pushing ethical boundaries. Does their good work for the community
therefore let them off the hook for their actions we often question or condemn?
A lot of those ethically-questionable actions are often the types of topics
that sell best, boosting their commercially driven agendas. So why wouldn’t
they push the boundaries?
Margret Simons (2017) highlights the importance
of public interest journalism to local communities and suggests that, while the
recent announcement of $60 million in federal government funding ‘for
journalism start-ups, regionals and independents’ is a step in the right
direction, but little more than a Band-Aid without a clear media policy and
strategic plan for further measures to turn the ‘crisis’ of public interest journalism
around (Simons, 2017).
![]() |
| A quote from Margret Simons article in The Guardian. |
References
Ethical Journalism Network. (n.d.). Is it in the Public’s
Interest? Retrieved from http://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/the-public-interest
Simons, M. (2017, September 15). The new media ownership law
doesn't address the real crisis journalism is facing. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/15/the-new-media-ownership-law-doesnt-address-the-real-crisis-journalism-is-facing


Comments
Post a Comment